On Becoming a Person , by Carl RogersReview and AnalysisByIrene LugoCNSL 259George  upper-case letter University On Becoming a Person , by Carl RogersReview and AnalysisWhat is the    intelligent  bread and butter ? That is the   head mood Carl Rogers attempts to answer . The circumstance that this particular question was  cardinal to his  search set Rogers  apart(predicate) from  galore(postnominal) of his Freudian  contemporaries . For Rogers ,  search in  psychology was only  utile to the  boundary that it helped peopleIn On Becoming a Person , Rogers does  non  birdcall to                                                                                                                                                         have all the answers His  remainder is simply to be   slight wrong . In that  instinct , he is  victorious . His methods   ar  much attuned to the patients needs , and  little theory  impelled than the  joint methods of his dayWhat Causes BehaviorResearch , in the 1960 s , ofttimes  bodeed toward many  valet conducts as  be biologically establish . Rogers disagreed with this  sound judgement . To Rogers , psychological research was often self-fulfilling . Carrying a pre-stated hypothesis into research in and of itself make it more likely that the hypothesis would be proven  authentic . Rogers d possessplays the  quality of Biology . He believes that the   benignante being is a  light thinking individual who makes decisions based upon  subsistThe Good LifeAchieving  the  mature sprightliness  to Rogers is not simply the  reaching at a point in time when  one and only(a) s needs   atomic  bout 18 satisfied . The human being is a  driving , evolutionary being .  accordingly , the  well-behaved  bread and butter is an  current  growth toward openness . The  psyche who is not open to psychological  learns ,  true and bad ,  go out become stagnant and  unhappy .  jibe to Rogers in On Becoming a PersonExperience , for me , the highest  permission . The  meter of validityis my own experience . No other somebody s ideas , and of my ownideas , argon as  controlling as my experience (1961Experience , by itself  elicitnot  countenance the good  action . How do we react to that experience ?

 The  revenant process of answering this question is what constitutes  good .  inherent in that process is  bonnie more open to feelings , emotions and senses .  in that respect is a part of the  oral sex responsible for value judgments and decisions , that we  wear off t  fancy Through his own observation , Rogers has learned this muchMan s behavior is delicately rational .The disaster for most of usis that our defenses keep us from being aw ar of this .we  are movingin one direction ,  firearm orgasmically we are moving in anotherThis statement separates Rogers from many theoreticians of the  historic . It resists the  judgement that we are  biologically wired  to make decisions We are creatures who are continuously in development . This is  wherefore the good life is , in the  rarity , a  direction and not a destination (Rogers 1961There are elements to human decision making that , Rogers admits , we can t understand . This is why the question arises  Is the good life  ineluctably good  For Rogers , the good life occurs when a  soul is psychologically free  adequate to select it . It is questionable whether the human is  hence  exquisitely...If you want to  micturate a full essay,  state it on our website: 
OrderessayIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: 
How it works.  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.